Submit a Comment to This Article
Jump to comment:
No comments have been published for this article.
In this issue
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Jump to section
- Article
- 1. Cost Considerations
- 2. Categorization of the LNG IUS
- 3. Entrenched Service Provider Perspectives and Behaviors
- 4. Uncertain Extrapolation From Recent Experience in Europe and the United States
- 5. Complexity of Introducing a New Method
- HOW THEN TO ACHIEVE THE FULL POTENTIAL FOR THE LNG IUS?
- THE WAY FORWARD: AN INITIAL “LEARNING” INTRODUCTION INITIATIVE
- CONCLUSION
- Notes
- REFERENCES
- Info & Metrics
- Comments
Related Articles
Cited By...
- What Have We Learned? Implementation of a Shared Learning Agenda and Access Strategy for the Hormonal Intrauterine Device
- Economic Evaluation of Provision of Postpartum Intrauterine Device Services in Bangladesh and Tanzania
- Expanding Contraceptive Method Choice With a Hormonal Intrauterine System: Results From Mixed Methods Studies in Kenya and Zambia
- Experiences With the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System Among Clients, Providers, and Key Opinion Leaders: A Mixed-Methods Study in Nigeria
- A Global Learning Agenda for the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System (LNG IUS): Addressing Challenges and Opportunities to Increase Access
- Liftoff: The Blossoming of Contraceptive Implant Use in Africa
- Expanding Access to a New, More Affordable Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System in Kenya: Service Delivery Costs Compared With Other Contraceptive Methods and Perspectives of Key Opinion Leaders