Figures & Tables
Tables
- TABLE. Pregnancy Rates in Studies of Contraceptive Implants and the Antiretroviral Efavirenz
Implant Type and Study Methodology No. of Women No. of Pregnancies Pregnancy Rate (95% CI) Period of Use LNG Patel11 Retrospective electronic database 191a 6 7.1 (1.5, 12.6) Unknown Perry12 Retrospective chart review 121 15 10a 16.4 months Scarsi13 Prospective clinical 20 3 15 48 weeks ENG Patel11 Retrospective electronic database 641a 15 5.5 (2.5, 8.4) Unknown Kreitchmann14 Prospective clinical 25b 0 0 3 years Unknown Pyra15 Secondary analysis of prospective study 9a 1 6 Unknown
In this issue
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Jump to section
- Article
- WHY REDUCED EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPLANTS IS AN IMPORTANT PROBLEM
- HOW DOES EFV DECREASE EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPLANTS?
- HOW MUCH DOES EFV REDUCE EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPLANTS?
- MIGHT ENG IMPLANTS BE MORE EFFECTIVE THAN LNG IMPLANTS?
- WHAT ABOUT THE EXPECTED INCREASE IN PREGNANCY RATES IN THE LATER YEARS OF IMPLANT USE WITH EFV?
- FOR WOMEN TAKING EFV, HOW DOES THE REDUCED EFFECTIVENESS WITH IMPLANTS COMPARE WITH OTHER CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS?
- WHAT DOES THIS EVIDENCE IMPLY FOR RECOMMENDATIONS ON USE OF IMPLANTS FOR WOMEN ON EFV?
- CONVEYING THIS EVIDENCE ON EFFECTIVENESS TO CLIENTS IS VERY CHALLENGING
- NEW ARVS A POSSIBLE LONGER-TERM SOLUTION
- Notes
- REFERENCES
- Figures & Tables
- Info & Metrics
- Comments
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.