Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
      • Local Voices Webinar
      • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Alerts
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • RSS
EDITORIAL
Open Access

Reduced Effectiveness of Contraceptive Implants for Women Taking the Antiretroviral Efavirenz (EFV): Still Good Enough and for How Long?

James D Shelton
Global Health: Science and Practice December 2015, 3(4):528-531; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00356
James D Shelton
aGlobal Health: Science and Practice, Editor-in-Chief, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 3 no. 4 528-531
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00356
PubMed 
26681700

Published By 
Global Health: Science and Practice
Online ISSN 
2169-575X
History 
  • Published online December 17, 2015.

Article Versions

  • Previous version (December 8, 2015 - 08:02).
  • You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Copyright & Usage 
© Shelton. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00356.

Author Information

  1. James D Sheltona
  1. a​Global Health: Science and Practice, Editor-in-Chief, Washington, DC, USA.
  1. Correspondence to James D Shelton (jshelton{at}ghspjournal.org).
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Article usage

Article usage: January 2018 to July 2025

AbstractFullPdf
Jan 201822529
Feb 201841983
Mar 201831845
Apr 20180954
May 201801307
Jun 20180709
Jul 2018115915
Aug 20182768
Sep 20182908
Oct 201801392
Nov 201801136
Dec 2018112210
Jan 201968217
Feb 201921045
Mar 201901214
Apr 201921372
May 201941288
Jun 201919615
Jul 201931887
Aug 201913109
Oct 201903194
Nov 201922366
Dec 201911706
Jan 20201693
Feb 20201775
Mar 202035217
May 20202567
Jun 20204429
Jul 20202273
Aug 20202405
Sep 20201337
Oct 20201778
Nov 20201489
Dec 202014210
Jan 20210242
Feb 20211371
Mar 20210345
Apr 20212264
May 20210461
Jun 20210612
Jul 202104113
Aug 20211418
Sep 20210455
Oct 202106623
Nov 202106312
Dec 20210532
Jan 202206713
Feb 20221449
Mar 20220468
Apr 20220713
May 202202612
Jun 20222538
Jul 20220351
Aug 20220388
Sep 202213510
Oct 20220577
Nov 20220786
Dec 20220402
Jan 2023117955
Feb 20230653
Mar 20230545
Apr 20231213
May 202301911
Jun 20230195
Jul 202301411
Aug 202302610
Sep 20230193
Oct 20230163
Nov 20230316
Dec 202302918
Jan 20240268
Feb 20240236
Mar 20241316
Apr 202401712
May 20240185
Jun 20242354
Jul 202402310
Aug 202421510
Sep 20241166
Oct 20240208
Nov 2024068
Dec 2024152
Jan 20250186
Feb 20250113
Mar 202501916
Apr 202502018
May 202511612
Jun 20250126
Jul 20251138
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 3 (4)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 3, No. 4
December 01, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reduced Effectiveness of Contraceptive Implants for Women Taking the Antiretroviral Efavirenz (EFV): Still Good Enough and for How Long?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Reduced Effectiveness of Contraceptive Implants for Women Taking the Antiretroviral Efavirenz (EFV): Still Good Enough and for How Long?
James D Shelton
Global Health: Science and Practice Dec 2015, 3 (4) 528-531; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00356

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reduced Effectiveness of Contraceptive Implants for Women Taking the Antiretroviral Efavirenz (EFV): Still Good Enough and for How Long?
James D Shelton
Global Health: Science and Practice Dec 2015, 3 (4) 528-531; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00356
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • WHY REDUCED EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPLANTS IS AN IMPORTANT PROBLEM
    • HOW DOES EFV DECREASE EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPLANTS?
    • HOW MUCH DOES EFV REDUCE EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPLANTS?
    • MIGHT ENG IMPLANTS BE MORE EFFECTIVE THAN LNG IMPLANTS?
    • WHAT ABOUT THE EXPECTED INCREASE IN PREGNANCY RATES IN THE LATER YEARS OF IMPLANT USE WITH EFV?
    • FOR WOMEN TAKING EFV, HOW DOES THE REDUCED EFFECTIVENESS WITH IMPLANTS COMPARE WITH OTHER CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS?
    • WHAT DOES THIS EVIDENCE IMPLY FOR RECOMMENDATIONS ON USE OF IMPLANTS FOR WOMEN ON EFV?
    • CONVEYING THIS EVIDENCE ON EFFECTIVENESS TO CLIENTS IS VERY CHALLENGING
    • NEW ARVS A POSSIBLE LONGER-TERM SOLUTION
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Supply Chain Workforce: The Foundation of Health Supply Chains
  • The Challenge Initiative: Lessons on Rapid Scale-Up of Family Planning and Adolescent and Youth Sexual and Reproductive Health Services
  • Low-Dose Antenatal Calcium Supplementation: An Intervention Ready for Prime Time
Show more EDITORIAL

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Health Topics
    • Family Planning and Reproductive Health
    • HIV/AIDS
    • Infectious Diseases
Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs

Follow Us On

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire