Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • FAQs
    • 5 Year Anniversary Infographic
  • More
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
    • Website Policies
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • FAQs
    • 5 Year Anniversary Infographic
  • More
    • Instructions for Reviewers
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
    • Website Policies
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Open Access

Tightening Up the Nomenclature for Non-Physician Clinicians: Why Not Call All of Them Physician Assistants?

Luppo Kuilman and Gomathi Sundar
Global Health: Science and Practice March 2015, 3(1):144-145; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00217
Luppo Kuilman
Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: l.kuilman@pl.hanze.nl
Gomathi Sundar
Indian Association of Physician Assistants, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Dear Editor-in-Chief,

This Letter is in reference to the article by KD Rao et al., “As good as physicians: patient perceptions of physicians and non-physician clinicians in rural primary health centers in India,” published in the November 2013 edition of Global Health: Science and Practice (GHSP).1 The authors have to be lauded for their efforts to produce evidence on patient perceptions of care provided by non-physician clinicians (NPCs)—an issue that receives little attention, as most of the focus is on the technical quality of care provided by such clinicians.

Debates have been ongoing about the best course of action to meet the health care needs of rural populations in India.2,3 Given that the Indian health care sector is a vast system with diverse needs and attendant challenges, it is reassuring to know that there are potential viable alternatives to allopathic doctors in areas with physician shortages.

Rao and colleagues introduced GHSP readers to a cadre of health care workers called rural medical assistants (RMAs). We would like to introduce to readers another cadre that has been present for nearly 2 decades in the Indian health care sector and that has been largely ignored for just as long—that of the physician assistant (PA).

The Indian PA workforce consists of close to 1,000 qualified health care professionals who are mainly deployed in hospital settings in urban areas. The PA program as offered by several institutions and their affiliated universities varies in duration, but in general, requires 3 years of didactic medical education followed by a 1-year internship in a chosen medical specialty; graduates receive a Bachelor of Science degree.4 Besides taking extensive coursework in basic and medical sciences and theory, PAs receive practical training to perform many medical tasks, including taking patients' medical history, conducting physical examinations, preparing medical notes, writing discharge summaries, counseling patients, and participating in clinical decision making and treatment. They undergo clinical rotations in major medical specialties throughout the program, and their performance is continually assessed.

Globally, the PA profession has its roots in the United States beginning in the early 1960s. As of 2013, the American PA workforce consisted of more than 90,000 certified clinicians, and training was offered at more than 173 programs throughout the country. Most programs grant a master's degree, and graduates are working in all medical specialties including primary care.5 Meanwhile, many other countries have observed the success of the PA profession and successively have employed PAs as a way to overcome the imbalance between the demand and supply of medical care, including Australia, Canada, England, Germany, Ghana, The Netherlands, and Scotland.6–9 Other countries are exploring the possibilities of deploying PAs, but clear documentation on their respective successes is still lacking.

Several local initiatives in India are currently employing different types of NPCs. Many look down upon such NPCs and set them aside as “half-doctors.” Understandably, there is concern that some NPCs have little medical education and/or training and are thus not qualified to diagnose and treat patients. But we appeal to all stakeholders involved in planning and managing the Indian health industry to grant a professional identity to those NPCs who are adequately trained. In this context, we feel it is very important to raise this topic to consider standardizing several local NPC initiatives into one new type of medical provider, regardless of whether they practice medicine in (rural and remote) family practices or in hospital settings. As long as the NPCs share more commonalities than differences in terms of educational outcomes and the medical tasks they are expected to perform, it may be plausible to classify them under one professional identity, i.e., as physician assistants. Classifying NPCs under the identity of the PA profession would also make it easier for societies to know whom to trust in a health care worker.

One reason why some countries have been successful in deploying PAs in their health systems may be because the initiatives were government-driven in contrast to the Indian situation. The State Medical University of Tamil Nadu in India has recognized the importance of PAs and has established a PA program in collaboration with a number of hospitals in the state, but, sadly enough, the program is yet to be under the purview of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

Some stakeholders in India want to explore allowing AYUSH practitioners to practice allopathy to address physician shortages.10 AYUSH practitioners are trained in Indian systems of medicine (Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha, Homeopathy). However, we think it would be more prudent to assist AYUSH practitioners in finding opportunities to practice within their own field and instead to explore the possibility of expanding the success of Indian PAs into rural areas. After all, several studies have demonstrated American PAs working successfully in rural and remote areas, including with respect to high patient satisfaction,11 good job satisfaction for the PAs themselves,12 and also to the satisfaction of the medical society.13

Notes

Competing Interests: None declared.

Cite this article as: Kuilman L, Sundar G. Tightening up the nomenclature for non-physician clinicians: why not call all of them physician assistants? Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015;3(1):144-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00217.

First published online: 2015 Feb 9

  • Received: 2014 Nov 24.
  • Accepted: 2014 Dec 2.
  • Published: 2015 Mar 1.
  • © Kuilman et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00217.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Rao KD,
    2. Stierman E,
    3. Bhatnagar A,
    4. Gupta G,
    5. Gaffar A
    . As good as physicians: patient perceptions of physicians and non-physician clinicians in rural primary health centers in India.Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013;1(3): 397–406. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00085. pmid:25276553
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Garg S,
    2. Singh R,
    3. Grover M
    . Bachelor of rural health care: do we need another cadre of health practitioners for rural areas?Natl Med J India. 2011; 24(1): 35–37. Available from: https://www.k4health.org/toolkits/hrh/bachelor-rural-health-care-do-we-need-another-cadre-health-practitioners-rural-areas
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Ramadoss A
    . The wrong way for rural doctors. The Hindu [Internet]. 2010 Feb 27 [cited 2014 Oct 6]; [about 3 p.]. Available from: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/the-wrong-way-for-rural-doctors/article114274.ece
  4. ↵
    1. Kuilman L,
    2. Sundar G,
    3. Cherian KM
    . Physician assistant education in India.J Physician Assist Educ. 2012;23(3): 56–59. pmid:23072073
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Glicken AD,
    2. Miller AA
    . Physician assistants: from pipeline to practice.Acad Med.2013;88(12): 1883–1889. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000009. pmid:24128623
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Jones IW,
    2. Dehn R
    . Where the Canadian physician assistants are in 2012.J Am Acad Physician Assist. 2012;25(10): 54. doi:10.1097/01720610-201210000-00013. pmid:23115872
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hooker RS,
    2. Kuilman L
    . Physician assistant education: five countries.J Physician Assist Educ. 2011;22(1): 53–58. pmid:21639078
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Merkle F,
    2. Ritsema TS,
    3. Bauer S,
    4. Kuilman L
    . The physician assistant: shifting the paradigm of European medical practice?HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2011;3(4): 255–62. pmid:23440027
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Farmer J,
    2. Currie M,
    3. Hyman J,
    4. West C,
    5. Arnott N
    . Evaluation of physician assistants in National Health Service Scotland.Scott Med J. 2011;56(3): 130–134. doi:10.1258/smj.2011.011109. pmid:21873716
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Yasmeen A
    . Allopathy practice by AYUSH doctors may be allowed in State. The Hindu [Internet]. 2013 Aug 17 [cited 2014 Dec 16]; [about 2 p.]. Available from: http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/allopathy-practice-by-ayush-doctors-may-be-allowed-in-state/article5031581.ece?css = print
  9. ↵
    1. Henry LR,
    2. Hooker RS
    . Retention of physician assistants in rural health clinics.J Rural Health. 2007;23(3): 207–14. doi:10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00092.x. pmid:17565520
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Muus KJ,
    2. Geller JM,
    3. Williams JD,
    4. Ludtke RL,
    5. Knowlton DD,
    6. Hart LG
    . Job satisfaction among rural physician assistants.J Rural Health. 1998;14(2): 100–108. doi:10.1111/j.1748-0361.1998.tb00611.x. pmid:9714998
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Henry LR,
    2. Hooker RS,
    3. Yates KL
    . The role of physician assistants in rural health care: a systematic review of the literature.J Rural Health. 2011;27(2): 220–229. doi:10.1111/j.1748-0361.2010.00325.x. pmid:21457316
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 3 (1)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 3, No. 1
March 01, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tightening Up the Nomenclature for Non-Physician Clinicians: Why Not Call All of Them Physician Assistants?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Tightening Up the Nomenclature for Non-Physician Clinicians: Why Not Call All of Them Physician Assistants?
Luppo Kuilman, Gomathi Sundar
Global Health: Science and Practice Mar 2015, 3 (1) 144-145; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00217

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Tightening Up the Nomenclature for Non-Physician Clinicians: Why Not Call All of Them Physician Assistants?
Luppo Kuilman, Gomathi Sundar
Global Health: Science and Practice Mar 2015, 3 (1) 144-145; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00217
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saving Mothers, Giving Life: Don’t Neglect the Health Systems Element
  • Authors’ Response to “Saving Mothers, Giving Life: Don’t Neglect the Health Systems Element”
  • Authors' Response to Editorial: Maternal Death Surveillance and Response: A Tall Order for Effectiveness in Resource-Poor Settings
Show more LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Similar Articles

US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Editorial Board
  • FAQs
  • Contact Us

© 2021 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire