Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
      • Local Voices Webinar
      • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Alerts
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • RSS
Original Articles
Open Access

Rising cesarean deliveries among apparently low-risk mothers at university teaching hospitals in Jordan: analysis of population survey data, 2002–2012

Rami Al Rifai
Global Health: Science and Practice May 2014, 2(2):195-209; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00027
Rami Al Rifai
aGraduate School of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Division of Public Health, Department of International Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: alrifai.ith{at}tmd.ac.jp
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE.

    Selection (Unweighted Numbers)

    Abbreviation: JPFHS, Jordan Population and Family Health Survey.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1. Background Characteristics of Survey Respondents by Year of Survey, Weighted Numbers (Percentages)
    Characteristics2002 (N = 3,450)2007 (N = 6,307)2012 (N = 6,365)
    SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC
    Age, y
     15–1955 (1.6)123 (1.9)135 (2.1)
     20–24515 (14.9)974 (15.4)854 (13.4)
     25–29884 (25.6)1654 (26.2)1669 (26.2)
     ≥ 301997 (57.9)3556 (56.4)3707 (58.2)
    Place of Residence
     Urban2705 (78.4)5298 (84.0)5198 (81.7)
     Rural746 (21.6)1009 (16.0)1167 (18.3)
    Geographic Region
     Central2191 (63.5)3908 (62.0)3935 (61.8)
     North930 (27.0)1844 (29.2)1821 (28.6)
     South329 (9.5)555 (8.8)609 (9.6)
    Mother's Education
     No education128 (3.7)147 (2.3)114 (1.8)
     Primary277 (8.0)337 (5.3)373 (5.9)
     Secondary2087 (60.5)3885 (61.6)3825 (60.1)
     Higher959 (27.8)1939 (30.7)2053 (32.2)
    Husband's Education
     No education65 (1.9)91 (1.5)59 (0.9)
     Primary371 (10.8)665 (10.6)661 (10.4)
     Secondary1980 (57.4)3793 (60.3)4000 (62.8)
     Higher1034 (30.0)1745 (27.7)1645 (25.8)
     Missing (Do not know)12 (0.2)1 (0.02)
    Employment
     Unemployed3101 (89.9)5526 (87.6)5381 (84.5)
     Employed350 (10.1)781 (12.4)985 (15.5)
    Place of Delivery
     Public sector2229 (64.6)4036 (64.0)4230 (66.5)
     Private sector1221 (35.4)2271 (36.0)2135 (33.5)
    Wealth Index
     Poorest786 (22.8)1462 (23.2)1313 (20.6)
     Poorer881 (25.5)1475 (23.4)1365 (21.4)
     Middle740 (21.4)1368 (21.7)1437 (22.6)
     Richer594 (17.2)1131 (17.9)1291 (20.3)
     Richest450 (13.0)872 (13.8)960 (15.1)
    OBSTETRIC
    Age at First Birth, y
     12–18687 (19.9)1110 (17.6)917 (14.4)
     19–242010 (58.3)3661 (58.1)3747 (58.9)
     25–30645 (18.7)1289 (20.4)1369 (21.5)
     > 30107 (3.1)246 (3.9)332 (5.2)
    Parity in Last 5 Years
     11881 (54.5)3531 (56.0)3733 (58.6)
     21263 (36.6)2254 (35.7)2182 (34.3)
     ≥ 3307 (8.9)522 (8.3)451 (7.1)
    Birth Weight, g
     Normal (2500–3999)2618 (75.9)4916 (77.9)4907 (77.1)
     Low or High (< 2500 or ≥ 4000)832 (24.1)1391 (22.1)1458 (22.9)
    Birth Multiplicity
     Singleton birth3371 (97.7)6185 (98.1)6225 (97.8)
     Multiple birth80 (2.3)123 (1.9)140 (2.2)
    • All data are reported as No. (%).

    • View popup
    TABLE 2. Cesarean Delivery Rate by Year of Survey and Background Characteristics, Weighted Percentages
    Characteristics200220072012
    %P Value%P Value%P ValuePercentage Point DifferenceaP Value for Trendb
    Overall Rate18.220.130.3
    Age, y.001<.001<.001.53
     15–1914.520.322.27.7
     20–2414.611.125.210.6
     25–2915.516.928.012.5
     ≥ 3020.524.032.812.3
    Place of Residence.33.45.12.74
     Urban18.620.330.712.1
     Rural17.019.228.411.4
    Geographic Region.008.18.06.37
     Central19.720.231.211.5
     North15.119.128.213.1
     South17.322.730.913.6
    Mother's Education.01.001<.001.75
     No education22.024.523.51.5
     Primary23.124.940.217.1
     Secondary16.618.629.012.4
     Higher19.922.031.311.4
    Partner's Education.13.44<.001.48
     No education23.120.728.85.7
     Primary16.921.533.016.1
     Secondary17.319.428.110.8
     Higher20.320.934.614.3
    Employment.02<.001<.001.02
     Unemployed17.719.428.510.8
     Employed22.624.840.117.5
    Place of Delivery.004.005.02.53
     Public sector16.819.029.412.6
     Private sector20.822.032.211.4
    Wealth Index.18<.001<.001.47
     Poorest17.417.028.811.4
     Poorer16.317.125.49.1
     Middle18.119.233.315.2
     Richer20.024.031.011.0
     Richest21.126.534.012.9
    Parity in Last 5 Years<.001.02.01.01
     120.121.330.09.9
     214.818.529.514.7
     ≥ 320.618.436.616.0
    Age at First Birth, y<.001<.001<.001<.001
     12–1816.916.824.37.4
     19–2416.717.027.010.3
     25–3020.328.234.514.2
     > 3043.938.566.923.0
    Birth Weight, g<.001<.001<.001.85
     Normal (2500–3999)16.318.128.412.1
     Low/High (< 2500 or ≥ 4000)24.227.136.612.4
    Birth Multiplicity<.001<.001<.001<.001
     Singleton birth17.319.329.512.2
     Multiple birth60.059.365.75.7
    • ↵a Percentage point difference between 2002 and 2012.

    • ↵b P value for the trend was obtained from logistic regression models by using outcome and explanatory variables as continuous variables and including interaction terms between survey year and each tested explanatory variable for the years 2002 and 2012.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3. Bivariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis on Trends in the Cesarean Delivery Rate, Among All Mothers and Stratified by Place of Delivery, Birth Weight, and Birth Multiplicity According to Year of Survey
    No. (%)OR (95% CI)aOR (95% CI)
    Among All Mothers
    2002629 (18.2)1.001.00
    20071267 (20.1)1.13 (1.01–1.25)*1.13 (1.01–1.26)*
    20121929 (30.3)1.95 (1.76–2.16)***1.90 (1.71–2.11)***
    By Place of Delivery
    Public Sector
     2002375 (16.8)1.001.00
     2007768 (19.0)1.16 (1.01–1.33)*1.15 (1.00–1.33)*
     20121242 (29.4)2.05 (1.80–2.34)***1.99 (1.74–2.28)***
    Private Sector
     2002254 (20.8)1.001.00
     2007499 (22.0)1.07 (0.90–1.27)1.06 (0.88–1.26)
     2012687 (32.2)1.80 (1.53–2.12)***1.70 (1.43–2.02)***
    By Birth Weight
    Normal
     2002428 (16.3)1.001.00
     2007890 (18.1)1.13 (0.99–1.28)1.11 (0.98–1.26)
     20121395 (28.4)2.03 (1.80–2.29)***1.93 (1.71–2.19)***
    Low/High
     2002201 (24.2)1.001.00
     2007377 (27.1)1.17 (0.96–1.42)1.13 (0.93–1.39)
     2012534 (36.6)1.81 (1.50–2.20)***1.73 (1.42–2.10)***
    By Birth Multiplicity
    Singleton Birth
     2002582 (17.3)1.001.00
     20071194 (19.3)1.15 (1.03–1.28)*1.14 (1.02–1.27)*
     20121838 (29.5)2.01 (1.81–2.23)***1.92 (1.72–2.13)***
    Multiple Birth
     200248 (60.0)1.001.00
     200773 (589.3)0.99 (0.55–1.75)0.98 (0.49–1.95)
     201292 (65.7)1.28 (0.72–2.26)1.29 (0.64–2.58)
    • Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio (for all covariates under analysis); CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

    • P value for the trend was obtained by entering the survey year as a continuous variable.

    • ↵*P< .05; *** P< .001.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4. Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis on Trends in the Cesarean Delivery Rate by Place of Delivery, Stratified by Birth Weight and Birth Multiplicity According to Year of Survey
    Public Hospitals (N = 10,496)Private Hospitals (N = 5,627)
    No. (%)aOR (95% CI)No. (%)aOR (95% CI)
    By Birth Weight
    Normal
     2002247 (14.8)1.00181 (19.1)1.00
     2007525 (17.0)1.17 (0.99–1.39)365 (19.9)1.00 (0.82–1.23)
     2012877 (27.4)2.06 (1.76–2.42)***519 (30.4)1.71 (1.41–2.09)***
    Low/High
     2002128 (22.9)1.0073 (26.7)1.00
     2007242 (25.3)1.12 (0.87–1.45)135 (31.0)1.22 (0.85–1.75)
     2012366 (35.6)1.87 (1.46–2.38)***168 (39.1)1.66 (1.16–2.38)**
    By Birth Multiplicity
    Singleton Birth
     2002347 (16.0)1.00234 (19.6)1.00
     2007718 (18.2)1.15 (0.99–1.33)476 (21.3)1.08 (0.90–1.29)
     20121171 (28.3)2.00 (1.74–2.29)***667 (31.8)1.76 (1.47–2.09)***
    Multiple Birth
     200228 (50.9)1.0020 (80.0)1.00
     200749 (60.5)1.85 (0.78–4.35)23 (56.1)0.32 (0.05–2.09)
     201272 (72.0)3.05 (1.27–7.33)*20 (50.0)0.08 (0.01–0.78)*
    • Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio (for all covariates under analysis); CI, confidence interval.

    • P value for the trend was obtained by entering the survey year as a continuous variable.

    • ↵*P< .05; ** P< .01; *** P< .001.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5. Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis on Cesarean Delivery Rate Among Mothers Delivering in Public Hospitals by Year of Survey, Stratified by Birth Weight and Birth Multiplicity According to Type of Public Hospital
    200220072012All Years Combined
    %aOR (95% CI)%aOR (95% CI)%aOR (95% CI)%aOR (95% CI)
    All Mothers
    Private20.81.0022.01.0032.21.0025.61.00
    Government (public)a16.60.86 (0.69–1.07)18.10.87 (0.75–1.02)28.50.91 (0.79–1.04)21.90.90 (0.83–0.99)*
    UTH (public)26.71.08 (0.57–2.05)50.04.24 (2.85–6.29)***49.11.69 (1.21–2.33)**45.62.29 (1.82–2.88)***
    Mothers Delivering in Public Hospitals (N = 10,494)
    Government16.61.0018.11.0028.51.0021.91.00
    UTH26.71.19 (0.63–2.27)50.04.20 (2.80–6.28)***49.11.69 (1.21–2.37)**45.62.31 (1.83–2.92)***
    Mothers Delivering in Public Hospitals By Birth Weight
    Normal Birth Weight
     Government14.51.0016.21.0026.51.0019.91.00
     UTH23.91.18 (0.55–2.55)44.13.44 (2.22–5.33)***47.11.55 (1.06–2.27)*42.22.15 (1.65–2.80)***
    Low/High Birth Weight
     Government22.51.0024.21.0034.71.0028.11.00
     UTH35.71.24 (0.35–4.41)83.327.50 (6.54–115.5)***57.12.30 (1.08–4.88)*60.63.13 (1.82–5.37)***
    Mothers Delivering in Public Hospitals By Birth Multiplicity
    Singleton Birth
     Government15.71.0017.21.0027.61.0021.01.00
     UTH29.61.73 (0.91–3.29)48.74.06 (2.70–6.08)***46.71.62 (1.15–2.28)**44.72.39 (1.88–3.02)***
    Multiple Birth
     Government57.11.0059.51.0069.21.0063.01.00
     UTH0.0NA100.0NA100.0NA64.71.02 (0.31–3.38)
    • Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio (for all covariates under analysis); CI, confidence interval; NA, not applicable; UTH, university teaching hospital.

    • ↵a Government hospitals include hospitals run by the Ministry of Health or the Royal Medical Services.

    • ↵*P< .05; ** P< .01; *** P< .001.

    • View popup
    TABLE 6. Logistic Regression Analysis on Cesarean Delivery Rate by Background Characteristics, Among All Mothers From All Survey Datasets (2002–2012)
    OR (95% CI)aOR (95% CI)
    Age, y
     15–191.001.00
     20–240.85 (0.63–1.14)0.82 (0.60–1.12)
     25–291.01 (0.80–1.42)0.97 (0.72–1.31)
     ≥ 301.47 (1.11–1.94)**1.05 (0.78–1.41)
    Place of Residence
     Urban1.001.00
     Rural0.90 (0.82–0.99)*0.96 (0.86–1.07)
    Geographic Region
     Central1.001.00
     North0.87 (0.80–0.94)**0.91 (0.83–0.99)*
     South1.02 (0. 90–1.16)1.03 (0.99–1.18)
    Mother's Education
     No education1.001.00
     Primary1.41 (1.08–1.85)*1.33 (1.00–1.78)*
     Secondary1.01 (0.80–1.29)0.96 (0.73–1.25)
     Higher1.11 (0.87–1.42)0.79 (0.60–1.06)
    Husband's Education
     No education1.001.00
     Primary1.14 (0.82–1.59)1.21 (0.84–1.73)
     Secondary1.02 (0.74–1.39)1.16 (0.81–1.65)
     Higher1.22 (0.89–1.68)1.17 (0.81–1.68)
    Employment
     Unemployed1.001.00
     Employed1.58 (1.43–1.75)***1.34 (1.19–1.51)***
    Place of Delivery
     Public sector1.001.00
     Private sector1.17 (1.08–1.26)***1.04 (0.95–1.14)
    Wealth Index
     Poorest1.001.00
     Poorer0.94 (0.84–1.05)0.94 (0.84–1.06)
     Middle1.20 (1.07–1.34)***1.27 (1.13–1.43)***
     Richer1.30 (1.16–1.45)***1.32 (1.16–1.51)***
     Richest1.47 (1.30–1.65)***1.39 (1.20–1.62)***
    Parity in Last 5 years
     11.001.00
     20.86 (0.79–0.93)***0.81 (0.75–0.88)***
     ≥ 31.04 (0.90–1.18)0.82 (0.70–0.95)*
    Age at First Birth, y
     12–181.001.00
     19–241.10 (0.98–1.22)1.14 (1.02–1.28)*
     25–301.72 (1.52–1.94)***1.75 (1.52–2.01)***
     > 304.69 (3.93–5.61)***4.58 (3.77–5.55)***
    Birth Weight, g
     Normal (2500–3999)1.001.00
     Low/High (< 2500 or ≥ 4000)1.55 (1.43–1.68)***1.53 (1.40–1.66)***
    Birth Multiplicity
     Singleton birth1.001.00
     Multiple birth5.47 (4.38–6.82)***5.60 (4.20–7.09)***
    • Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio (for all covariates under analysis); CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

    • ↵*P< .05; ** P< .01; *** P< .001.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 2 (2)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 2, No. 2
May 01, 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rising cesarean deliveries among apparently low-risk mothers at university teaching hospitals in Jordan: analysis of population survey data, 2002–2012
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Rising cesarean deliveries among apparently low-risk mothers at university teaching hospitals in Jordan: analysis of population survey data, 2002–2012
Rami Al Rifai
Global Health: Science and Practice May 2014, 2 (2) 195-209; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00027

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Rising cesarean deliveries among apparently low-risk mothers at university teaching hospitals in Jordan: analysis of population survey data, 2002–2012
Rami Al Rifai
Global Health: Science and Practice May 2014, 2 (2) 195-209; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00027
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Scaling Up Improved Inpatient Treatment of Severe Malnutrition: Key Factors and Experiences From South Africa, Bolivia, Malawi, and Ghana
  • HIV Care Continuum Services for People Who Inject Drugs in Kazakhstan During COVID-19: A Qualitative Study of Service Provider Perspectives
  • Let's Talk About Sex: Improving Measurement of Contraceptive Use in Cross-Sectional Surveys by Accounting for Sexual Activity Recency
Show more Original Articles

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Health Topics
    • Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health
Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs

Follow Us On

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire