Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
      • Local Voices Webinar
      • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Alerts
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • RSS
REVIEW
Open Access

Simulation-Based Education of Health Workers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

Samuel J.A. Robinson, Angus M.A. Ritchie, Maurizio Pacilli, Debra Nestel, Elizabeth McLeod and Ramesh Mark Nataraja
Global Health: Science and Practice December 2024, 12(6):e2400187; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00187
Samuel J.A. Robinson
aDepartment of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
bDepartment of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
cDepartment of Paediatric Surgery and Monash Children’s Simulation, Monash Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angus M.A. Ritchie
aDepartment of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
bDepartment of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
cDepartment of Paediatric Surgery and Monash Children’s Simulation, Monash Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maurizio Pacilli
aDepartment of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
bDepartment of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
cDepartment of Paediatric Surgery and Monash Children’s Simulation, Monash Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Debra Nestel
aDepartment of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
dDepartment of Surgery (Austin Precinct), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth McLeod
eDepartment of Paediatric and Neonatal Surgery, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramesh Mark Nataraja
aDepartment of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
bDepartment of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
cDepartment of Paediatric Surgery and Monash Children’s Simulation, Monash Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ram.nataraja@monash.edu
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplements
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Key Findings

  • Simulation-based education (SBE) has been successfully applied to improve outcomes in a variety of contexts across low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with most studies demonstrating at least a partial improvement in outcomes.

  • Simulation modalities are most commonly low-technology modalities, including mannequins and scenario-based simulation.

  • Learning methods are often reported insufficiently to judge against reporting standards which have been predominantly developed in high-income countries.

Key Implications

  • Further research is needed in LMICs and into specific SBE modalities.

  • Improved reporting of SBE is needed, which may require greater representation and consultation of LMICs in the development of a future global consensus on reporting.

ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Simulation-based education (SBE) is increasingly used to improve clinician competency and patient care and has been identified as a priority by the World Health Organization for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The primary aim of this review was to investigate the global distribution and effectiveness of SBE for health workers in LMICs. The secondary aim was to determine the learning focus, simulation modalities, and additional evaluation conducted in included studies.

Methods:

A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis guidelines, searching Ovid (Medline, Embase, and Emcare) and the Cochrane Library from January 1, 2002, to March 14, 2022. Primary research studies reporting evaluation at Level 4 of The Kirkpatrick model were included. Studies on simulation-based assessment and validation were excluded. Quality and risk-of-bias assessments were conducted using appropriate tools. Narrative synthesis and descriptive statistics were used to present the results.

Results:

A total of 97 studies were included. Of these, 54 were in sub-Saharan Africa (56%). Forty-seven studies focused on neonatology (48%), 29 on obstetrics (30%), and 16 on acute care (16%). Forty-nine used mannequins (51%), 46 used scenario-based simulation (47%), and 21 used synthetic part-task trainers (22%), with some studies using more than 1 modality. Sixty studies focused on educational programs (62%), while 37 used SBE as an adjunct to broader interventions and quality improvement initiatives (38%). Most studies that assessed for statistical significance demonstrated at least partial improvement in Level 4 outcomes (75%, n=81).

Conclusion:

SBE has been widely applied to improve outcomes in a variety of contexts across LMICs. Modalities of simulation are typically low-technology versions. However, there is a lack of standardized reporting of educational activities, particularly relating to essential features of SBE. Further research is required to determine which approaches are effective in specific contexts.

  • Received: April 17, 2024.
  • Accepted: October 13, 2024.
  • Published: December 20, 2024.
  • © Robinson et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00187

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 12 (6)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 12, No. 6
December 20, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Simulation-Based Education of Health Workers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Simulation-Based Education of Health Workers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review
Samuel J.A. Robinson, Angus M.A. Ritchie, Maurizio Pacilli, Debra Nestel, Elizabeth McLeod, Ramesh Mark Nataraja
Global Health: Science and Practice Dec 2024, 12 (6) e2400187; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00187

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Simulation-Based Education of Health Workers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review
Samuel J.A. Robinson, Angus M.A. Ritchie, Maurizio Pacilli, Debra Nestel, Elizabeth McLeod, Ramesh Mark Nataraja
Global Health: Science and Practice Dec 2024, 12 (6) e2400187; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00187
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Author contributions
    • Competing interests
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplements
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Antenatal Care Interventions to Increase Contraceptive Use Following Birth in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis
  • Interventions to Address the Health and Well-Being of Married Adolescents: A Systematic Review
Show more REVIEW

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Cross-Cutting Topics
    • Health Workers
Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs

Follow Us On

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2025 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire