Good Management Practice Is Correlated With Good Performance of Community-Engaged Primary Health Care Facilities in Peru

Figures & Tables

TABLE 1.

Percentage of CLAS PHC Facilities that Completed Contracted Goals, by DIRESA and Study Group, Peru

Group 1^a	Callao	Loreto	Tacna	Piura	Arequipa	Cusco	Total
Facilities that met goals, no. (%)	3 (100.0)	147 (94.2)	67 (94.3)	192 (90.1)	210 (88.9)	35 (89.7)	654 (91.1)^b
Total facilities, no.	3	156	71	213	236	39	718
Group 2	Moquegua	Ica	Apurímac	Huánuco	Cajamarca	Ancash	Total
Facilities that met goals, no. (%)	42 (73.6)	42 (70.0)	48 (67.6)	40 (35.0)	52 (20.0)	25 (20.3)	249 (37.6)
Total facilities, no.	57	60	71	114	259	123	663

Abbreviations: CLAS, Comunidad Local de Administración de Salud; DIRESA, regional health directorate; PHC, primary health care.
^a Completion of goals in comanagement contracts, based on local health plans.
^b Chi-square difference in the 2 study groups: X2=(1,N=1381)=452.82, P<.01.

TABLE 2.

Percentage of Good Management Practices Used to Support CLAS Facilities, by DIRESA and Study Group, Peru

Group 1^a	Callao	Loreto	Tacna	Piura	Arequipa	Cusco	Total
Practices reported, no. (%)	15 (46.9)	16 (50.0)	12 (37.5)	14 (43.8)	11 (34.8)	10 (31.3)	78 (40.6)^c
Practices considered, no.	32	32	32	32	32	32	192
Group 2^b	Moquegua	Ica	Apurímac	Huánuco	Cajamarca	Ancash	Total
Practices reported, no. (%)	8 (25.0)	9 (28.1)	6 (18.8)	10 (31.3)	7 (21.9)	6 (18.8)	46 (24.0)
Practices considered, no.	32	32	32	32	32	32	192

Abbreviations: CLAS, Comunidad Local de Administración de Salud; DIRESA, regional health directorate.
^a DIRESAs with a higher level of compliance with the goals contracted by CLAS.
↵^b DIRESAs with a lower level of compliance with the goals contracted by CLAS.
↵^c Chi-square difference in study groups with Yates correction: X2=(1,N=384)=11.45, P<.01.