Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
      • Local Voices Webinar
      • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Special Collections
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Tips for Writing About Programs in GHSP
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Alerts
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • RSS
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Open Access

Keeping the Customer Satisfied: Applying a Kano Model to Improve Vaccine Promotion in the Philippines

Jonas Wachinger, Mark Donald C. Reñosa, Jerric Rhazel Guevarra, Jhoys Landicho-Guevarra, Maria Paz Demonteverde, Catherine Silvestre, Vivienne Endoma, Jeniffer Landicho, Mila F. Aligato, Thea Andrea Bravo, Rachel P. Chase and Shannon A. McMahon
Global Health: Science and Practice December 2023, 11(6):e2300199; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00199
Jonas Wachinger
aHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Donald C. Reñosa
aHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
bDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine – Department of Health, Muntinlupa, Philippines.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jerric Rhazel Guevarra
bDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine – Department of Health, Muntinlupa, Philippines.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jhoys Landicho-Guevarra
bDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine – Department of Health, Muntinlupa, Philippines.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Paz Demonteverde
bDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine – Department of Health, Muntinlupa, Philippines.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine Silvestre
bDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine – Department of Health, Muntinlupa, Philippines.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vivienne Endoma
bDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine – Department of Health, Muntinlupa, Philippines.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeniffer Landicho
bDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine – Department of Health, Muntinlupa, Philippines.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mila F. Aligato
bDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine – Department of Health, Muntinlupa, Philippines.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thea Andrea Bravo
bDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine – Department of Health, Muntinlupa, Philippines.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel P. Chase
aHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
cDepartment of Research Information Technology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shannon A. McMahon
aHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
dDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplements
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1

    Relationships Between Types of Quality Attributes and End-User Satisfaction in the Kano Model

  • FIGURE 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2

    Mapped Kano Importance Coefficients

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    The 6 Types of Attribute Classifications in the Kano Model

    Quality AttributeDefinition
    Must-be (M)Basic requirements of a product: Absence of must-be attributes leads to increased dissatisfaction, but their presence is not associated with increased satisfaction.
    Attractive (A)Cherries on top: Absence of attractive attributes does not cause dissatisfaction, but their presence increases satisfaction considerably.
    One-dimensional (O)The more the better: Satisfaction increases linearly with the degree to which a one-dimensional attribute is present.
    Reverse (R)Presence of reverse attributes causes dissatisfaction, but their absence is appreciated.
    Indifferent (I)Whether present or absent, indifferent attributes don't lead to an increase in satisfaction or dissatisfaction.
    Questionable (Q)Response patterns to the Kano questionnaire are contradictory (e.g., when a respondent indicates that an attribute must be present and must not be present at the same time).
    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Functional and Dysfunctional Questions and Their Response Options

    QuestionResponse Options
    Functional question: How would you feel if attribute X were present in the final product?
    • (a) I like it that way.

    • (b) It must be that way.

    • (c) I am neutral.

    • (d) I can live with it that way.

    • (e) I dislike it that way.

    Dysfunctional question: How would you feel if attribute X were not present in the final product?
    • View popup
    TABLE 3.

    Attributes Included in the Kano Questionnaire and Their Descriptions

    IDAttributeDescription
    Intervention characteristics
    A1VideoPreference to receive vaccine information as a video
    A2CartoonPreference to receive vaccine information in animated form
    A3Short durationPreference for a short communication product (less than 5 minutes)
    A4TextPreference for a video-based intervention to include written text, such as subtitles
    A5Resource informationPreference to receive a pamphlet after the intervention which highlights further resources and lists contact addresses
    A6Key message summariesPreference to receive a pamphlet which summarizes the key messages of the communication product
    Intervention distribution
    B1ShareabilityPreference to be able to share the communication product via Facebook or other social media
    B2Trusted messengerPreference for the communication product to be distributed by a known and trusted person
    B3Health center locationPreference for the communication product to be screened/distributed at the health center
    B4PrivacyPreference to be alone when watching the communication product
    B5National logoPreference for the communication product to include the logos of national organizations and authorities
    B6International logoPreference for the communication product to include the logos of international organizations and authorities
    Intervention content
    C1Fact-basedPreference for the product to focus on presenting scientific facts
    C2Story-basedPreference for the product to include narratives and stories of individuals
    • View popup
    TABLE 4.

    Classification Assignment in the Kano Modela

    Dysfunctional Question (Attribute Not Present)
    1: Like2: Must-Be3: Neutral4: Live With5: Dislike
    Functional question (Attribute present)
    1: LikeQAAAO
    2: Must-BeRIIIM
    3: NeutralRIIIM
    4: Live WithRIIIM
    5: DislikeRRRRQ
    • Abbreviations: A, attractive; I, indifferent; M, must-be; O, one-dimensional; Q, questionable; R, reverse.

    • ↵a For example, if a respondent answers the functional question with “I like it that way” and the corresponding dysfunctional question with “I dislike it that way,” then the respective attribute is classified as one-dimensional.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5.

    Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Study Sample

    CharacteristicsNo. (%)
    (N=205)
    Gender
        Female200 (98)
        Male5 (2)
    Educational background
        Never attended school2 (1)
        Elementary22 (11)
        High school undergraduate26 (13)
        High school graduate90 (44)
        Vocational education9 (4)
        College undergraduate32 (16)
        College graduate23 (11)
        Graduate studies1 (<1)
    Occupation
        Housewife106 (52)
        None32 (16)
        Business (e.g., service and sales workers)19 (9)
        Self-employed (e.g., online business, retail)16 (8)
        Professional (e.g., doctors, engineers, IT)13 (6)
        Manual laborer (e.g., craft and related trade workers)12 (6)
        Farmer0 (0)
        Fisherman0 (0)
        Others7 (3)
    Vaccination behavior
        Previously delayed or refused vaccination56 (27)
            Previously delayed vaccination41 (20)
            Previously refused vaccination21 (10)
        Would vaccinate their child today196 (96)
    Previous sources of vaccination information (multiple answers possible)
        Barangay health workers104 (51)
        Family members69 (34)
        Midwives48 (23)
        Social media39 (19)
        Television33 (16)
        Nurses27 (13)
        Friends22 (11)
        Doctors11 (5)
        Newspapers10 (5)
    • Abbreviation: IT, information technology.

    • View popup
    TABLE 6.

    Kano Classifications and CCA Results

    Individuals Classifying Attribute as A/O/M/I/R/Q Type, %Resulting ClassificationEstimated Binary Truth ValueCCA Item TruthItem Difficulty
    AttributeAOMIRQOriginalRevisedCCA
    A1 video316438a1111III00.020.74
    A2 cartoon131842a288III00.000.30
    A3 short duration621252a225III00.000.24
    A4 text242026a2530MMM11.000.42
    A5 resource information29a21182911AAA11.000.48
    A6 key message summaries22232033a11IbObOb11.000.53
    B1 shareability27201730a52IbAbAb11.000.59
    B2 trusted messenger11122736a410IbMbMb10.690.88
    B3 location2913931a216IbAbIb10.450.88
    B4R company239738a1013III00.010.72
    B5 national logo1940a192010OOO11.000.25
    B6 international logo18242234a11IbObOb11.000.54
    C1 fact-based1057a221100OOO11.000.09
    C2 story-based1330a292611OOO11.000.40
    • Abbreviations: A, attractive; CCA, cultural consensus analysis; I, indifferent; M, must-be; O, one-dimensional; Q, questionable; R, reverse.

    • ↵a Represents the modal classification.

    • ↵b Instances where classification varied between different classification approaches.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental material

    • Supplement -

      Supplement

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 11 (6)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 11, No. 6
December 22, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Keeping the Customer Satisfied: Applying a Kano Model to Improve Vaccine Promotion in the Philippines
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Keeping the Customer Satisfied: Applying a Kano Model to Improve Vaccine Promotion in the Philippines
Jonas Wachinger, Mark Donald C. Reñosa, Jerric Rhazel Guevarra, Jhoys Landicho-Guevarra, Maria Paz Demonteverde, Catherine Silvestre, Vivienne Endoma, Jeniffer Landicho, Mila F. Aligato, Thea Andrea Bravo, Rachel P. Chase, Shannon A. McMahon
Global Health: Science and Practice Dec 2023, 11 (6) e2300199; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00199

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Keeping the Customer Satisfied: Applying a Kano Model to Improve Vaccine Promotion in the Philippines
Jonas Wachinger, Mark Donald C. Reñosa, Jerric Rhazel Guevarra, Jhoys Landicho-Guevarra, Maria Paz Demonteverde, Catherine Silvestre, Vivienne Endoma, Jeniffer Landicho, Mila F. Aligato, Thea Andrea Bravo, Rachel P. Chase, Shannon A. McMahon
Global Health: Science and Practice Dec 2023, 11 (6) e2300199; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00199
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Funding
    • Disclaimer
    • Author contributions
    • Competing interests
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplements
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Messy but worth it: human-centred design as applied within a successful vaccine-promotive campaign
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Comprehensive Strategy to Mitigate Institutional Maternal Mortality: Lessons From a Quality Improvement Initiative in Brazilian Maternity Hospitals
  • Research and Learning Priorities for a Surgical Obstetrics and Family Planning Project Implementing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Results of an Expert Consultation
  • Uganda Public Health Fellowship Program’s Contributions to Malaria Control Programs 2015–2022: Strategies, Implementation Challenges, and Opportunities
Show more ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Health Topics
    • Immunization/Vaccines
Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs

Follow Us On

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire