Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
      • Integration of COVID-19 Vaccination into Primary Health Care
      • Provider Behavior Change for Improved Health Outcomes
      • The Challenge Initiative Platform
      • Call for Abstracts
      • The Responsive Feedback Approach
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Alerts
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
EDITORIAL
Open Access

Maternal Death Surveillance and Response: Looking Backward, Going Forward

Matthews Mathai
Global Health: Science and Practice April 2023, 11(2):e2300099; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00099
Matthews Mathai
aAssociate Editor, Global Health: Science and Practice Journal; Independent consultant, St. John’s, NL, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

See related article by Tura et al.

Understanding why a woman died during or immediately after pregnancy and childbirth is a crucial first step toward preventing other women from dying in the same way. Besides understanding the medical cause of death, it is also important to know the woman’s personal story and the other nonmedical factors that may have contributed to her death.

In 2012, the World Health Organization (WHO) and partners launched maternal death surveillance and response (MDSR) as an approach to end preventable maternal mortality. MDSR follows a continuous cycle of notification, review, analysis, and response. Many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) moved quickly to adopt MDSR in their national policies and practices.1 By 2016, 85% of LMICs reportedly had a national policy to review all maternal deaths. However, only 46% of LMICs reportedly had national maternal death review committees that met at least biannually, thus highlighting the need for countries to follow through on their policy commitments and “complete the loop” in the surveillance-response cycle.2

Ethiopia introduced national MDSR in 2013. It was among the first sub-Saharan countries to capture maternal deaths at the facility and community levels. The decision to make maternal mortality a weekly reportable condition within public health emergency management in 2014 led to its integration with the existing disease surveillance system in the country.3 However, the effective implementation of MDSR in Ethiopia has faced many challenges. While strong political support and leadership facilitated its introduction,3 reported barriers to implementation have included politicization of the reporting and review process, defensive attitudes, blame-shifting, poor attendance, and fear of legal repercussions.4,5

ADAPTING OBSTETRIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS FOR LMIC SETTINGS

In this issue of GHSP, Tura and colleagues6 report on a hospital-based obstetric surveillance system in eastern Ethiopia. Adapted for the Ethiopian context from obstetric surveillance systems used in high-income countries (HICs), the system collects information from 13 participating health care facilities in the region on selected maternal morbidities (hemorrhage, eclampsia, uterine rupture, sepsis, and severe anemia) and maternal deaths. Ten maternal deaths and 904 women with the morbidities of interest were reported among 17,317 live births in these facilities in the first 6 months. Staff were also trained to conduct confidential enquiries into maternal deaths (CEMD).

While this externally funded hospital-based surveillance project has worked well in the short term in 1 region, it is unclear how this approach will, in the longer term, contribute to improved maternal survival across Ethiopia. Considerable financial support would be needed to run another surveillance system in parallel to an existing national system. Long-term sustainability will require buy-in from the government and closer integration with national surveillance systems.

Tura et al. report that the existing national MDSR system reportedly captures less than 10% of maternal deaths. Underreporting of maternal deaths, albeit at lesser levels, occurs even in HICs.7 However, ensuring corrective actions (the “response”) are taken after reviewing even a small proportion of deaths could contribute to improvement to maternal health and survival.

The authors’ statement that “…while the MDSR is a facility-based review of maternal death by a multidisciplinary committee to identify the cause of the death and design an appropriate response for preventing similar deaths at that facility in the future, CEMD focuses on more general recommendations that extend beyond the review of a single case at a specific facility” misinterprets WHO guidance on MDSR.8 Well-functioning MDSR systems also include maternal deaths outside health facilities and corrective actions to recommend that go beyond the health care facility. Unlike HICs, where most births take place in hospitals and maternal deaths are rare, half of births in Ethiopia are still at home.9 The CEMD process, as reported by Tura et al., focuses only on maternal deaths in hospitals.

ESTABLISHING MDSR TAKES TIME

MDSR systems take time to establish and will encounter challenges in early implementation. WHO guidance on MDSR recommends a phased approach to implementation.8 The importance to “think big but to start small and grow gradually” cannot be overemphasized. Many LMICs have aspired to implement CEMD at the national level without first establishing good confidential (“no name”) and nonpunitive (“no blame”) audit practices at the facility and community levels. The first maternal death reviews in the United Kingdom were initiated by health care workers in Rochdale in northwestern England who were concerned with having the highest rate of maternal mortality in the country.10 This local practice was adopted in other jurisdictions over the following 2 decades leading to the establishment of the first national CEMD in 1952. Obstetric surveillance of maternal morbidities was established several decades later, only after maternal deaths had become uncommon.

To develop functional MDSR, think big but start small and grow gradually.

Successful MDSR implementation can be expected to lead to improved quality of care and reduced maternal mortality. As noted by Willcox and colleagues11 “the key context to enable effective death surveillance and response was a blame-free learning environment with good leadership.” The politicization of maternal death reviews and the fear of punitive actions and litigations, as reported from Ethiopia,4,5 can be demotivating and lead to “a vicious cycle of under-reporting, inaccurate data, and inadequate review and recommendations, which lead to demotivation and disengagement.”11 Lessons from this project and from global experiences on the facilitators and barriers to successful implementation should inform efforts to make the Ethiopian national MDSR system more effective.

Competing interests

None declared.

Notes

Cite this article as: Mathai M. Maternal death surveillance and response: looking backward, going forward. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2023;11(2):e2300099. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00099

  • Received: March 29, 2023.
  • Accepted: March 29, 2023.
  • Published: April 28, 2023.
  • © Mathai.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00099

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Mathai M,
    2. Dilip TR,
    3. Jawad I,
    4. Yoshida S
    . Strengthening accountability to end preventable maternal death. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131 Suppl 1:S3–S5. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.02.012. pmid:26433501
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    World Health Organization (WHO). Time to Respond: A Report on the Global Implementation of Maternal Death Surveillance and Response. WHO; 2016. Accessed March 29, 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241511230
  3. 3.↵
    1. Abebe B,
    2. Busza J,
    3. Hadush A, et al
    . ‘We identify, discuss, act and promise to prevent similar deaths’: a qualitative study of Ethiopia’s Maternal Death Surveillance and Response system. BMJ Global Health. 2017;2(2):e000199. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000199. pmid:28589016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Melberg A,
    2. Mirkuzie AH,
    3. Sisay TA,
    4. Sisay MM,
    5. Moland KM
    . ‘Maternal deaths should simply be 0’: politicization of maternal death reporting and review processes in Ethiopia. Health Policy Plan. 2019;34(7):492–498. doi:10.1093/heapol/czz075. pmid:31365076
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Tura AK,
    2. Fage SG,
    3. Ibrahim AM, et al
    . Beyond no blame: practical challenges of conducting maternal and perinatal death reviews in Ethiopia. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020;8(2):150–154. doi:10.9745/ghsp-d-19-00366. pmid:32461200
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Tura AK,
    2. Girma S,
    3. Dessie Y,
    4. Bekele D,
    5. Stekelenburg J,
    6. van den Akker T,
    7. Knight M
    on behalf of the Ethiopian Obstetric Surveillance System Steering Committee. Establishing the Ethiopian Obstetric Surveillance System for monitoring maternal outcomes in Eastern Ethiopia: a pilot study. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2023;11(2):e2200281. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00281
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Schuitemaker N,
    2. Van Roosmalen J,
    3. Dekker G,
    4. Van Dongen P,
    5. Van Geijn H,
    6. Gravenhorst JB
    . Underreporting of maternal mortality in The Netherlands. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(1):78–82. doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00128-2. pmid:9207818
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    World Health Organization (WHO). Maternal Death Surveillance and Response: Technical Guidance: Information for Action to Prevent Maternal Death. WHO; 2013. Accessed March 29, 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506083
  9. 9.↵
    Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI); ICF. Ethiopia Mini Demographic and Health Survey 2019: Final Report. EPHI/ICF; 2021. Accessed March 29, 2023. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR363/FR363.pdf
  10. 10.↵
    1. Loudon I
    . Maternal mortality in the past and its relevance to developing countries today Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72(1 Suppl):241S–246S. doi:10.1093/ajcn/72.1.241S. pmid:10871589
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Willcox ML,
    2. Okello IA,
    3. Maidwell-Smith A,
    4. Tura AK,
    5. van den Akker T,
    6. Knight M
    . Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Bull World Health Organ. 2023;101:62–75G. doi:10.2471/blt.22.288703. pmid:36593778
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 11 (2)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 11, No. 2
April 28, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Maternal Death Surveillance and Response: Looking Backward, Going Forward
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Maternal Death Surveillance and Response: Looking Backward, Going Forward
Matthews Mathai
Global Health: Science and Practice Apr 2023, 11 (2) e2300099; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00099

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Maternal Death Surveillance and Response: Looking Backward, Going Forward
Matthews Mathai
Global Health: Science and Practice Apr 2023, 11 (2) e2300099; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00099
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ADAPTING OBSTETRIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS FOR LMIC SETTINGS
    • ESTABLISHING MDSR TAKES TIME
    • Competing interests
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Ten Years for GHSP: Where Are We Now? Where Will We Go?
  • Nurturing and Optimizing Networks of Care to Maximize Benefits to Patients, Health Workers, and Health Systems
Show more EDITORIAL

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Cross-Cutting Topics
    • Health Systems
  • Health Topics
    • Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health
US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2023 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire