Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
      • The Challenge Initiative Platform
      • Call for Abstracts
      • The Responsive Feedback Approach
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Alerts
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Open Access

Regarding “Willingness to Pay for HIV Prevention Commodities Among Key Population Groups in Nigeria”

Victor Abiola Adepoju, Kristina Grabbe, Catey Laube, Chidinma Umebido, Zahariyya Hassan and Adetiloye Oniyire
Global Health: Science and Practice February 2023, 11(1):e2200445; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00445
Victor Abiola Adepoju
aJhpiego, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: schrodinga05@yahoo.com
Kristina Grabbe
bJhpiego, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catey Laube
bJhpiego, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chidinma Umebido
aJhpiego, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zahariyya Hassan
aJhpiego, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adetiloye Oniyire
aJhpiego, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

See related article by Durosinmi-Etti et al.

The study by Durosinmi-Etti et al.1 explored the willingness to pay (WTP) for HIV prevention commodities (i.e., HIV self-testing [HIVST], preexposure prophylaxis, and condoms) among 1,169 individuals identifying as key populations (KPs), which consisted of female sex workers and men who have sex with men (MSM) in 3 Nigerian states. The authors reported that 81% of the respondents were willing to pay for HIVST, 32% were willing to pay the retail market price of Nigerian Naira (N)1,600 (US$4.20), and the majority (42%) of KPs were willing to pay lower than the market price (i.e., N500–N1,500 (US$1.30–US$4.00). However, the study recognized certain limitations. The authors recommended integrating supply- and demand-side interventions, such as cross-subsidizing prevention commodities through government insurance, subsidy, the Basic Health Care Provision Fund, a tax waiver for imported commodities, and social marketing to accommodate the various market segments comprising a spectrum of incomes. This study has further advanced our understanding of self-reported WTP for these lifesaving HIV prevention tools and provided new insights that could guide HIV prevention policy development and program planning for KPs in Nigeria.

Despite the laudable findings of this study, there are gaps and limitations that future studies need to address. First, the study did not address how WTP affects future purchasing and frequency of purchasing given that not all respondents may be willing to pay N1,600 (US$4.20) every 3 months (i.e., if experiencing frequent potential HIV exposures and/or retesting for preexposure prophylaxis). Initial or first-time WTP may not translate into WTP as often as the commodity is needed. One of the goals of HIVST is to achieve social and behavioral change and demand for future use.2 Therefore, HIVST may be of utility by increasing initial and repeat testing.3 For instance, 67.4% of Australian MSM would test more frequently if the test is convenient: self-administered with an immediate result.4 However, in South Africa, high cost was highlighted as a major barrier to repeat HIVST following initial exposure to HIVST, especially among high sexual risk-taking populations, a possible behavioral response to risk exposure.5 Therefore, the feasibility of HIVST for repeat testing and the impact of cost on WTP for repeat or future HIVST are gaps in implementation science research that HIV prevention initiatives must urgently address.

Moreover, rather than reporting on observed demand for HIVST, the Durosinmi-Etti et al. study explored self-reported WTP for HIVST among KPs. Self-reported WTP studies are largely prone to exaggerated responses compared to actual demand. Chang et al. conducted a randomized controlled trial in Zimbabwe to explore how price changes impact demand for HIVST among 4,000 adults. The authors observed a sharp and significant decline in demand for HIVST, from 32.5% when the commodity was distributed free of charge to less than 3% when the price was N443 (US$1.00) and more. Their finding further strengthens the argument that stated WTP studies are usually exaggerated when compared to observed/actual WTP in real-world programming where low-income populations could be highly sensitive to price increases and demand for prevention products.6

Furthermore, the study failed to adjust for the effect of global economic crisis, inflation, dip in external reserves, instability of local currency, and forex scarcity that have mostly affected low- and middle-income countries. These economic indices have had a disproportionate and wider impact on final commodity cost to the end user and WTP but were not considered in the WTP estimation for the study. A similar study conducted in 2018 by Tun et al. reported a WTP of US$5.50 among MSM in Nigeria, equivalent to N2,000 when the official exchange rate was N364 to US$1. By 2022, a study in the same setting and population by Durosinmi-Etti et al. reported a WTP of N1,600, the equivalent of US$4.20 when the exchange rate was N381 for US$1.1,7 It is difficult to compare these studies without standardizing with the current exchange rate, which gives a WTP of US$4.20 in 2022 and US$5.20 in 2018. Due to forex scarcity, many local distributors cannot get forex at the official rate from the central bank and have been forced to buy forex in the more expensive “black market” to settle commodity payment for manufacturers, which are usually paid in US dollars rather than the local currency, thereby increasing the final retail and end-user cost.

Perhaps, a better way to conceptualize WTP is to align the easily accessible “black market” forex rate with the local currency value, which determines the purchasing power of the end user. This approach will likely give a more modest WTP estimate. Similar to the study by Durosinmi-Etti et al.,1 previous studies have also highlighted disparities in the amount willing to be paid for HIVST across country income settings, population types, and types of specimen collected (blood versus saliva).8–14 Respondents in middle-to high-income countries were more willing to pay a higher price for test kits (US$1.00 to >US$50.00) when compared to respondents from low-income countries (US$0.54–US$4.20) 8–13 while young unemployed individuals were willing to pay less for HIVST.14

Policy prescriptions by Durosinmi-Etti et al.,1 such as tax waivers on product importation, will go a long way to reduce the final cost of commodities to the end user. In addition, ongoing global price negotiation efforts for the prevention tools should factor exchange rate fluctuations in sub-Saharan Africa and strike multiyear fixed price deals. The final landing cost is more important for private providers and end users in low- and middle-income countries because supply chain and freight costs are very high in this global economic crisis. The ex works price includes the value of all the materials used and all other costs related to its production, minus any internal taxes, which are, or may be, repaid when the product obtained is exported. In ex works arrangements, the seller/manufacturer delivers the product to a designated location (usually at the port of the receiving country), and the buyer incurs transport costs and any damage to the product from the port to the point of delivery in-country. These additional in-country costs, largely from transportation, add up to the final landing cost if they are not factored in the initial contracts and negotiation with the seller/manufacturer.

Program managers working on HIV prevention should work with private provider networks to cap profit margins when selling to end users. Failure to do this could frustrate all market-shaping efforts and perpetuate barriers to access, affordability, and coverage. The ultimate goal is to achieve local production of these commodities, and this will require government dedication, policy support, and investment. The high WTP values of US$4.20 in the current study and US$5.20 in the previous study in Nigeria are concerning when there have been intensified global efforts to drive down HIVST prices and make testing affordable for end users. Presenting an inflated WTP without considering some of the issues previously mentioned may work against these global efforts, leading to keeping manufacturers’ prices high, minimizing their access by end users, and undermining the global public health effort to make HIVST accessible and affordable for all.

Competing interests

None declared.

Notes

First Published Online: January 25, 2023.

Cite this article as: Adepoju VA, Grabbe K, Laube C, Umebido C, Hassan Z, Oniyire A. Regarding “Willingness to pay for HIV prevention commodities among key population groups in Nigeria.” Glob Health Sci Pract. 2023;11(1):e2200445. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00445

  • Received: October 5, 2022.
  • Accepted: November 18, 2022.
  • Published: February 28, 2023.
  • © Adepoju et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00445

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Durosinmi-Etti O,
    2. Nwala EK,
    3. Oki F,
    4. et al
    . Willingness to pay for HIV prevention commodities among key population groups in Nigeria. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022;10(5):e2100303. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00303. pmid:36316139
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Paltiel AD,
    2. Walensky RP
    . Home HIV testing: good news but not a game changer. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(10):744–746. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-10-201211200-00545. pmid:23044643
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Jennings L,
    2. Conserve DF,
    3. Merrill J,
    4. et al
    . Perceived cost advantages and disadvantages of purchasing HIV self-testing kits among urban Tanzanian men: an inductive content analysis. J AIDS Clin Res. 2017;08(08):725. doi:10.4172/2155-6113.1000725. pmid:29051841
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bavinton BR,
    2. Brown G,
    3. Hurley M,
    4. et al
    . Which gay men would increase their frequency of HIV testing with home self-testing? AIDS Behav. 2013;17(6):2084–2092. doi:10.1007/s10461-013-0450-z. pmid:23525790
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Harichund C,
    2. Kunene P,
    3. Simelane S,
    4. Abdool Karim Q,
    5. Moshabela M
    . Repeat HIV testing practices in the era of HIV self-testing among adults in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0212343. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212343. pmid:30794580
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Chang W,
    2. Matambanadzo P,
    3. Takaruza A,
    4. et al
    . Effect of prices, distribution strategies, and marketing demand for HIV self-testing in Zimbabwe: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(8):e199818. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9818. pmid:31461146
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Tun W,
    2. Vu L,
    3. Dirisu O,
    4. Sekoni A,
    5. Shoyemi E,
    6. Njab J,
    7. Ogunsola S,
    8. Adebajo S
    . Uptake of HIV self-testing and linkage to treatment among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Nigeria: a pilot programme using key opinion leaders to reach MSM. J Int AIDS Soc. 2018;21(Suppl 5):e25124. doi:10.1002/jia2.25124. pmid:30033680
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Ochako R,
    2. Vu L,
    3. Peterson K
    . Insights Into Potential Users and Messaging for HIV Oral Self-Test Kits in Kenya: Grantee Final Report. International Initiative for Impact Evaluation; 2014. Accessed November 21, 2022. https://www.3ieimpact.org/sites/default/files/2018-12/insights_into_potential_users-final.pdf
  9. 9.
    1. Bilardi JE,
    2. Walker S,
    3. Read T,
    4. et al
    . Gay and bisexual men’s views on rapid self-testing for HIV. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(6):2093–2099. doi:10.1007/s10461-012-0395-7. pmid:23297083
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    1. Xun H,
    2. Kang D,
    3. Huang T,
    4. et al
    . Factors associated with willingness to accept oral fluid HIV rapid testing among most-at-risk populations in China. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80594. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080594. pmid:24260432
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.
    1. de la Fuente L,
    2. Rosales-Statkus ME,
    3. Hoyos J,
    4. et al
    ; Madrid Rapid HIV Testing Group. Are participants in a street-based HIV testing program able to perform their own rapid test and interpret the results? PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46555. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046555. pmid:23056342
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.
    1. Ng OT,
    2. Chow AL,
    3. Lee VJ,
    4. et al
    . Accuracy and user-acceptability of HIV self-testing using an oral fluid-based HIV rapid test. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45168. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045168. pmid:23028822
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Han L,
    2. Bien CH,
    3. Wei C,
    4. et al
    . HIV self-testing among online MSM in China: implications for expanding HIV testing among key populations. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;67(2):216–221. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000000278. pmid:24991972
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Obiezu-Umeh C,
    2. Gbajabiamila T,
    3. Ezechi O,
    4. et al
    . Young people’s preferences for HIV self-testing services in Nigeria: a qualitative analysis. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):67. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-10072-1. pmid:33413246
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 11 (1)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 11, No. 1
February 28, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Regarding “Willingness to Pay for HIV Prevention Commodities Among Key Population Groups in Nigeria”
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Regarding “Willingness to Pay for HIV Prevention Commodities Among Key Population Groups in Nigeria”
Victor Abiola Adepoju, Kristina Grabbe, Catey Laube, Chidinma Umebido, Zahariyya Hassan, Adetiloye Oniyire
Global Health: Science and Practice Feb 2023, 11 (1) e2200445; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00445

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Regarding “Willingness to Pay for HIV Prevention Commodities Among Key Population Groups in Nigeria”
Victor Abiola Adepoju, Kristina Grabbe, Catey Laube, Chidinma Umebido, Zahariyya Hassan, Adetiloye Oniyire
Global Health: Science and Practice Feb 2023, 11 (1) e2200445; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00445
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Competing interests
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Author’s Response to Letter on “Willingness to Pay for HIV Prevention Commodities Among Key Population Groups in Nigeria”
  • Regarding “A Cluster-Randomized Trial to Test Sharing Histories as a Training Method for Community Health Workers in Peru”
Show more LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Health Topics
    • HIV/AIDS
US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2023 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire