Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
      • The Challenge Initiative Platform
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Alerts
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
EDITORIALS
Open Access

Addressing the Global Influence of Unethical Formula Marketing

Cecília Tomori
Global Health: Science and Practice April 2022, 10(2):e2200120; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00120
Cecília Tomori
aJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
bDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ctomori1@jh.edu
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

See related article by Reinsma et al.

Unethical marketing of commercial milk formulas remains a global challenge.1 Despite the establishment of the Code more than 40 years ago, steps for its implementation remain inadequate. Few nations have adopted the Code in their legal frameworks, and the monitoring and enforcement of the laws and regulations remains inadequate. As a result, rampant violations of the Code continue, undermining breastfeeding and putting hundreds of lives at risk each year.2,3 The recent large World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF study1 undertaken in 8 countries with thousands of participants demonstrates that formula companies continue to have a pervasive influence on infant feeding decisions. They deploy sophisticated, emotionally resonant messages through multiple channels to undermine confidence in breastfeeding and to capture consumers. Distorting science is a key part of their strategy to convince parents as well as health professionals. The report's findings demonstrate the importance of efforts to enforce the Code so that families can make informed decisions.

In a recent issue of GHSP, Reinsma et al.4 describe the evaluation of a project in the Philippines that aimed to address the gap in monitoring by building a platform that enabled reporting Code violations. As part of the project, the team provided outreach to a wide range of people including members of the community, community health workers, health care providers, breastfeeding advocates, and government agencies about the laws to help prepare for reporting violations using newly developed platforms, including a website, an app, and free short message service (SMS) messages. The project then evaluated the reporting system. The team found several improvements in feeling more informed about the laws and empowered by the reporting system. At the same time, their findings also indicated several challenges, including the preference for in-person resolution of violations over a digital platform and concerns over confidentiality. Moreover, coordinating with government stakeholders proved complex. The team found the coordination challenging and time consuming, and even after launching the project, few reports of violations were addressed.

While some of the challenges are due to limited resources, many complexities Reinsma et al.4 describe are embedded in deeper histories. To better understand these challenges, we must examine the long history of formula companies' efforts to assert influence. Nestlé's marketing efforts in the Philippines date back to 1895 and the company continues to play a dominant role, sharing the vast majority of the market with Reckitt Bensicker, which produces Mead Johnson.5 Aggressive marketing has continued even after the adoption of the WHO Code into laws. Indeed, systematic efforts to undermine breastfeeding by companies remain the norm, rather than the exception. For instance, in 2017 Mead Johnson targeted health professionals directly with claims about one of its products to circumvent advertising regulations. This was a highly successful strategy, leading to a substantial increase in sales (40%) over 3 months.6,7 Such aggressive marketing efforts are coupled with extensive corporate activities undertaken to influence laws and implement marketing practices that subvert regulations and undermine breastfeeding.

Systematic efforts to undermine breastfeeding by companies remain the norm, rather than the exception.

As described in detail by Baker et al.,5 formula companies in the Philippines have engaged in extensive efforts to undermine marketing regulations, relying on multipronged efforts. A key component was establishing a corporate front group with other formula manufacturers called the Infant and Pediatric Nutrition Association of the Philippines (IPNAP), which participates widely in important meetings about infant and child nutrition and has carried our extensive lobbying activities. For instance, IPNAP lobbied to pass legislation in 2012 that was framed as helpful for nutrition, but, in reality, it undermined existing breastfeeding protections by facilitating formula donations during disasters without prior approval, allowing marketing in health facilities, and enabling companies to carry out health professional education. IPNAP had an extremely close relationship with the government with a former Department of Health employee and Congressman at its helm. While the 2012 legislative effort was unsuccessful, in the past 10 years, corporate lobbying activity continued, including efforts to distribute formula during disasters. This is particularly galling since the Philippines experiences a frequent number of disasters from weather and volcanic activity in the region and the harms of formula distribution in these situations are well documented.8,9

The activities mentioned here are just a selection of corporate political activities undertaken in the Philippines. In light of this history, it is not surprising that coordinating with the government proved challenging. Political will is necessary to succeed in fully implementing and enforcing laws. Unfortunately, corporate actors play an enormous role in undermining them. Of course, such practices are hardly unique across settings.10

Reinsma et al.4 demonstrate the challenges of enforcing the Code even when legal frameworks are supportive. Without adequate systems that work with and for local communities, laws remain insufficient. To address these issues, projects aiming to enhance Code implementation need to closely examine the history of corporate activities in government organizations and health care settings and develop a sophisticated understanding of the current landscape of these efforts. Mobilizing stakeholders within the government as well as within public health and community organizations needs to be the foundation of implementation efforts. Any reporting system must have consequences—if reports remain unaddressed, they become futile. Throughout this process, as Reinsma et al. point out, it's essential to listen to local communities' preferences for how they wish to be engaged in Code implementation efforts. Any effort must prioritize confidentiality to avoid reprisals, and technological solutions may not always be best suited to achieve aims. What may work in one context may not be appropriate in another. Together, these findings also suggest that prioritizing local knowledge and expertise can not only help achieve immediate aims but also make them more sustainable in the long run while also taking up calls from the Global South to decolonize and address the power imbalances in the infrastructure of global health.11

It's essential to listen to local communities' preferences for how they wish to be engaged in Code implementation efforts.

Competing interests

None declared.

Notes

Cite this article as: Tomori C. Addressing the global influence of unethical formula marketing. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022;10(2): e2200120. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00120

  • Received: April 15, 2022.
  • Accepted: April 15, 2022.
  • Published: April 28, 2022.
  • © Tomori.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00120

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF. How the Marketing of Formula Milk Influences Our Decisions on Infant Feeding. WHO/UNICEF; 2022. Accessed April 15, 2022. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240044609
  2. 2.↵
    1. Victora CG,
    2. Bahl R,
    3. Barros AJ,
    4. et al
    . Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):475–490. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01024-7. pmid:26869575
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Rollins NC,
    2. Bhandari N,
    3. Hajeebhoy N,
    4. et al
    . Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? Lancet. 2016;387(10017):491–504. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01044-2. pmid:26869576
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Reinsma K,
    2. Ballesteros AJC,
    3. Bucu RAA,
    4. et al
    . Mother-Baby Friendly Philippines: using citizen reporting to improve compliance to the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022;10(1):e2100071. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00071. pmid:35294373
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Baker P,
    2. Zambrano P,
    3. Mathisen R,
    4. et al
    . Breastfeeding, first-food systems and corporate power: a case study on the market and political practices of the transnational baby food industry and public health resistance in the Philippines. Global Health. 2021;17(1):125. doi:10.1186/s12992-021-00774-5. pmid:34702285
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Garrovillo M
    . Enfa A+ Gentlease Rorsh*t – How a brand talked sh*t and achieved a 40% increase in sales. WARC. Accessed April 15, 2022. https://www.warc.com/content/paywall/article/warc-prize-asia/enfa_a_gentlease_rorsht_how_a_brand_talked_sht_and_achieved_a_40_increase_in_sales/en-GB/111800?
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hastings G,
    2. Angus K,
    3. Eadie D,
    4. Hunt K
    . Selling second best: how infant formula marketing works. Global Health. 2020;16(1):77. doi:10.1186/s12992-020-00597-w. pmid:32859218
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Dall'Oglio I,
    2. Marchetti F,
    3. Mascolo R,
    4. et al.
    (2020). Breastfeeding protection, promotion, and support in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review of literature. J Hum Lact. 36(4):687–698. doi:10.1177/0890334419900151. pmid:32032499
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Infant Feeding in Emergencies (IFE) Core Group. Infant and Young Child Feeding in Emergencies: Operational Guidance for Emergency Relief Staff and Programme Managers. (Version 3.0). IFE;2017. Accessed April 15, 2022. https://www.unhcr.org/45f6cd022.pdf
  10. 10.↵
    1. Baker P,
    2. Russ K,
    3. Kang M,
    4. et al
    . Globalization, first-foods systems transformations and corporate power: a synthesis of literature and data on the market and political practices of the transnational baby food industry. Global Health. 2021;17(1):58. doi:10.1186/s12992-021-00708-1. pmid:34020657
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Abimbola S,
    2. Asthana S,
    3. Montenegro C,
    4. et al
    . Addressing power asymmetries in global health: imperatives in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS Med. 2021;18(4): e1003604. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003604. pmid:33886540
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 10 (2)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 10, No. 2
April 28, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Addressing the Global Influence of Unethical Formula Marketing
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Addressing the Global Influence of Unethical Formula Marketing
Cecília Tomori
Global Health: Science and Practice Apr 2022, 10 (2) e2200120; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00120

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Addressing the Global Influence of Unethical Formula Marketing
Cecília Tomori
Global Health: Science and Practice Apr 2022, 10 (2) e2200120; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00120
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Competing interests
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Context Matters: Strategies to Improve Maternal and Newborn Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Global Health: Science and Practice … 5 Years In
Show more Editorials

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Health Topics
    • Nutrition
US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2023 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire