Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
      • The Challenge Initiative Platform
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search

User menu

  • My Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Global Health: Science and Practice
  • Other Useful Sites
    • GH eLearning
    • GHJournal Search
  • My Alerts

Global Health: Science and Practice

Dedicated to what works in global health programs

Advanced Search

  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Advance Access
    • Archive
    • Supplements
    • Topic Collections
  • For Authors
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Publish a Supplement
    • Promote Your Article
    • Resources for Writing Journal Articles
  • About
    • About GHSP
    • Editorial Team
    • Advisory Board
    • FAQs
    • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Webinars
    • Local Voices Webinar
    • Connecting Creators and Users of Knowledge
    • Publishing About Programs in GHSP
  • Alerts
  • Visit GHSP on Facebook
  • Follow GHSP on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Find GHSP on LinkedIn
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Open Access

Global Research Priorities for Understanding and Improving Respectful Care for Newborns: A Modified Delphi Study

Hagar Palgi Hacker, Elena Ateva, R. Rima Jolivet, Bushra Al-makaleh, Theresa Shaver and Emma Sacks
Global Health: Science and Practice February 2022, 10(1):e2100292; https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00292
Hagar Palgi Hacker
aGeorge Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena Ateva
bWhite Ribbon Alliance, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Rima Jolivet
cWomen & Health Initiative, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bushra Al-makaleh
dIndependent public health advisor, Sanaa, Yemen.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theresa Shaver
eU.S. Agency for International Development Contractor Social Solutions International, Inc., Washington, DC, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emma Sacks
fDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: esacks@jhu.edu
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplements
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF
Loading

Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE

    Modified Delphi Work Process Used to Identify a Prioritized List of Research Questions on Respectful Care for Newborns

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Characteristics of Participants in Round 2 Survey on Identifying Questions Related to Respectful Care for Newborns

    No. (%)
    Gendera
     Female36 (78.3)
     Male9 (19.6)
     Other1 (2.2)
    Primary role related to newborn careb,c
     Research25 (53.2)
     Program design, implementation, or evaluation27 (57.5)
     Aid-work5 (10.6)
     Advocacy12 (25.5)
     Doctor15 (31.9)
     Midwife6 (12.8)
     Doula1 (2.1)
     Mother, parent, or other family4 (8.5)
     Other6 (12.8)
    Organization type
     Birth facility (including hospitals, clinics, and birth centers)1 (2.1)
     Government5 (10.6)
     Nongovernmental organization23 (48.9)
     University or research institute16 (34.0)
     Other2 (4.3)
    Main region of workc
     High-income countries8 (17.0)
     Middle-income countries13 (27.7)
     Low-income countries31 (66.0)
     Humanitarian settings1 (2.1)
    • ↵a 46 participants answered the gender question.

    • ↵b Categories that received no answers are not included here.

    • ↵c Multiple answers allowed.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Ranking of Results of Round 2 Survey on Questions Related to Respectful Care for Newborns

    Frequency in Top 3, No. (%)Weighted Mean ScoreaLevel of Importance (Top 3 in Category)
    Descriptive questions (N=52)
     What are the manifestations of disrespectful care or mistreatment of newborns that are observed in the context of facility based maternity care?25 (48.1)3.0High (1)
     How is respectful care of newborns defined by parents, by providers, and by the population in general?19 (36.5)3.1High (2)
     What are the perceptions and beliefs of health workers that affect the quality of care they provide to newborns?15 (28.9)3.4High (3)
     What is the prevalence of disrespect of newborns in health care facilities?14 (26.9)3.4High (3)
    Implementation questions (N=50)
     How can respectful care of newborns be promoted as the standard of care in a given health facility?20 (40.0)3.1High (1)
     How can health facility and management challenges be overcome to improve respectful care for newborns?17 (34.0)3.3High (2)
     What are the successful strategies for advocating for respectful care of newborns?13 (26.0)3.5High (3)
    Measurement questions (N=47)
     What are the measurable and appropriate quantitative metrics for respectful care of newborns?35 (74.5)2.1High (1)
     What is the impact of positive maternal prenatal and intra-partum experiences on birth outcomes?17 (36.2)3.3High (2)
     How can respectful care for newborns be measured qualitatively?17 (36.2)3.5High (3)
    • ↵a The lowest mean represents the highest importance.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental material

    • Text s01, PDF - Text s01, PDF
    • Text s02, DOCX - Text s02, DOCX
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Global Health: Science and Practice: 10 (1)
Global Health: Science and Practice
Vol. 10, No. 1
February 28, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Global Health: Science and Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Global Research Priorities for Understanding and Improving Respectful Care for Newborns: A Modified Delphi Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Global Health: Science and Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Global Health: Science and Practice web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Global Research Priorities for Understanding and Improving Respectful Care for Newborns: A Modified Delphi Study
Hagar Palgi Hacker, Elena Ateva, R. Rima Jolivet, Bushra Al-makaleh, Theresa Shaver, Emma Sacks
Global Health: Science and Practice Feb 2022, 10 (1) e2100292; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00292

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Global Research Priorities for Understanding and Improving Respectful Care for Newborns: A Modified Delphi Study
Hagar Palgi Hacker, Elena Ateva, R. Rima Jolivet, Bushra Al-makaleh, Theresa Shaver, Emma Sacks
Global Health: Science and Practice Feb 2022, 10 (1) e2100292; DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00292
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • BACKGROUND
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Funding
    • Disclaimer
    • Author contributions
    • Competing interests
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplements
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Timely Access to Essential Surgery, Surgical Workforce, and Surgical Volume: Global Surgery Indicators in Mexico
  • Applying the COM-B Model to Understand the Drivers of Mistreatment During Childbirth: A Qualitative Enquiry Among Maternity Care Staff
  • Perspectives of Muslim Religious Leaders to Shape an Educational Intervention About Family Planning in Rural Tanzania: A Qualitative Study
Show more ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Health Topics
    • Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health
US AIDJohns Hopkins Center for Communication ProgramsUniversity of Alberta

Follow Us On

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Advance Access Articles
  • Past Issues
  • Topic Collections
  • Most Read Articles
  • Supplements

More Information

  • Submit a Paper
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • GH Journals Database

About

  • About GHSP
  • Advisory Board
  • FAQs
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2023 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN: 2169-575X

Powered by HighWire